| Theme | Surveillance after Treatment for Colorectal Tumors | |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Appropriate Intervals for Surveillance Colonoscopy after Cold Polypectomies | |
| Publish Date | 2018/07 | |
| Author | Hiroko Nakahira | Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute |
| Author | Yoji Takeuchi | Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute |
| Author | Noriko Matsuura | Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute |
| Author | Koji Higashino | Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute |
| Author | Noriya Uedo | Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute |
| Author | Ryu Ishihara | Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute |
| [ Summary ] | We investigated the recurrence rate of small/diminutive polyps for patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in our institution. In 335 cases with 1,144 lesions, 136 (40 %) underwent surveillance colonoscopy. The median follow-up period was twenty six months. The range was eight months to forty seven months. Recurrence was diagnosed in two lesions (0.4 %). It is unlikely that the recurrence rate for those with CSP is higher than for those with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) as indicated in previous reports. Although it seems to be that we do not need to consider shorter surveillance periods after CSP, there is reason to consider shorter surveillance intervals when the lesions are intra-mucosal carcinomas. | |