INTESTINE Vol.17 No.3(1-3-1)


特集名 ここまで来たIEE─NBI/BLIの意義と位置づけ
題名 大腸病変に対するNBI分類とその診断における有用性 (3) 自施設分類から見た分類統一への考え方 a.国立がん研究センター東病院
発刊年月 2013年 05月
著者 池松 弘朗 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 加藤 知爾 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 大瀬良 省三 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 宮本 英明 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 依田 雄介 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 小田柿 智之 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 大野 康寛 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 金子 和弘 国立がんセンター東病院消化管内視鏡科
著者 佐野 寧 佐野病院消化器センター
【 要旨 】 大腸内視鏡の分野において,NBI診断の有用性が明らかになりつつあるが,多くの分類が提唱されているという問題があり,分類の統一が急務である.
当院で使用しているCapillary patternは,純粋に血管のみの分類である.腫瘍・非腫瘍の鑑別は有用であるが,深達度診断は,pit patternより診断能は低い.また,陥凹型病変では多彩な血管所見を呈することから深読み傾向にある.今後統一に向けてこれらの問題点を解決していく必要がある.
Theme Image-enhanced endoscopy -- Current status and significance of colorectal NBI and BLI
Title Efficacy of and problems with Capillary pattern classification using NBI for diagnosis of colorectal lesions
Author Hiroaki Ikematsu Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Tomoji Kato Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Shozo Osera Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Hideaki Miyamoto Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Yusuke Yoda Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Tomoyuki Odagaki Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Yasuhiro Oono Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Kazuhiro Kaneko Division of Endoscopy & Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East
Author Yasushi Sano Sano Hospital
[ Summary ] Observation of micro-capillary (MC) vessels using Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) which requires no application of dye solutions has recently been used for colorectal diagnosis. A problem exists in that there are many NBI classifications for colorectal lesions. Our aim was to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of and problems with the Capillary pattern system for NBI classification now in use. Lesions evaluated by both pit patterns and Capillary patterns were derived from our database. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed on the basis of individual pathological reports after endoscopic removal or surgery. From October 2005 to March 2009, 1,731 eligible lesions were examined in this study. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to distinguish between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions were 98.5 %, 99.0 %, and 92.4 %, equivalent to those obtained through pit pattern classification. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) for depth infiltration of neopastic lesions were 97.7 %, 73.2 %, 98.9 %, 98.7 % and 75.3 %. Our results regarding depth of infiltration, especially in PPV, were somewhat inferior to those obtained for evaluation using pit pattern classifications. NBI was the most reliable method to distinguish between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions. In contrast, diagnostic ability when using NBI magnifying observation for lesions infiltrating into deeper submucosal layers was inferior to the diagnostic ability for use of pit patterns with dye solutions. Furthermore, there was a problem with formulating diagnoses because depressed lesions present various vascular findings.
戻る