臨牀消化器内科 Vol.31 No.2(2)


特集名 有効性評価に基づく胃がん検診ガイドライン―内視鏡検診時代の新たなる幕開け
題名 ガイドライン改訂に当たっての変更点と課題
発刊年月 2016年 02月
著者 濱島 ちさと 国立研究開発法人国立がん研究センターがん予防・検診研究センター検診研究部検診評価研究室
【 要旨 】 「有効性評価に基づく胃がん検診ガイドライン」が9年ぶりに改訂された.X線については,旧版評価に加え,さらに科学的根拠が蓄積された.内視鏡検診については,日韓の症例対照研究により死亡率減少効果が証明された.X線検診,内視鏡検診の利益(死亡率減少効果)と不利益を勘案し,両者ともに対策型検診・任意型検診として推奨された.Helicobacter pylori抗体とペプシノゲン法の併用によるがん検診としての死亡率減少効果は不明であることから,対策型検診としては推奨に至らなかった.しかし,リスク層別化は可能である.今後も,内視鏡検診の科学的根拠については,引き続き検討が必要である.
Theme Evidence-based Guidelines Version 2 for Gastric Cancer Screening ; The Beginning of a New Era of Endoscopic Cancer Screening
Title Changes and Issues in the Revised Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening
Author Chisato Hamashima Cancer Screening Assessment Section, Cancer Screening Assessment and Management Division, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center
[ Summary ] The first Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening were published in 2005, and revised for the first time in 2014. In the previous guidelines, radiographic screening using an upper gastrointestinal radiography with a barium meal was the only method recommended. In the revised guidelines, mortality reduction from gastric cancer due to radiographic screening has been reevaluated, based on the previous guidelines and additional results obtained from cohort studies. Although endoscopic screening was not recommend in the previous guidelines, its effectiveness was evaluated based on the results of case‒control studies conducted in Korea and Japan. Although there were harms including adverse effects, false‒positive and overdiagnosis in radiographic and endoscopic screening, the rates of adverse effects were higher in endoscopic screening than those of radiographic screening. Based on the balance of benefits and harms, radiographic screening and endoscopic screening were both recommended for population‒based screening and opportunistic screening in the revised guidelines. Since there no evidence for reduction of mortality from gastric cancer was found, screening using a combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen was not recommended for population‒based screening. However, this method can be used for risk stratification of gastric cancer. Evaluation of the effectiveness of endoscopic screening should be continued for validation.
戻る